Authors: Vincent Kenny  Stephen Lenzini  Woo Soo Choe [Winter 2016]
Steward: Jian Gong and Fengqi You
Process simulation is extremely beneficial to engineers, allowing them to further understand processes, identify process advantages and limitations, and provide quantitative process outputs and properties. Modeling reactors and their corresponding reactions is difficult by nature but can be rewarding if done correctly. This page provides essential information on the topic of reactor simulation using the computer program Aspen HYSYS.
Aspen HYSYS Reactor Simulation Basics
The HYSYS program allows the user to define reactions primarily based on desired model outputs and available information. After defining process components, the user can choose a reaction type as listed in the section below. HYSYS includes a number of different reactor models for the various reaction types, desired outputs, and specification limitations as well as standard PFR and CSTR models as described in this section.
Unlike other simulation programs, HYSYS attempts to calculate all variables at all times which can be helpful or frustrating at times. The user can utilize the "hold" function in order to cease this process.
Because simulation requires reaction characteristics, parameters, and other information, it is important to conduct background research appropriate to the reaction of interest before beginning the actual simulation. If theoretical or empirical data do not exist for the reaction, it may be difficult or impossible to conduct a computer simulation (see Additional Options). It follows that an increasing number of reaction byproducts requires an increasing amount of reaction data. Users should not be concerned if they cannot quantitatively specify or simulate all reaction by-products or outputs; in the end, a simulation as a process approximation and is inherently unable to model the process completely.
Of course, the phase of the reaction must be known; unfortunately, however, HYSYS does not support solid phase modeling and thus a different approach must be chosen (AspenTech).
Aspen Plus Fluidized Bed Reactor Simulation
The fluidized bed reactor is a reactor in which the fluid from the bottom of the reactor keeps the solid catalysts suspended inside the reactor. This reactor has an advantage over traditional packed bed reactor because it has a better heat and mass transfer. In industry, the fluidized bed reactor is most prominently used to produce products which cannot be efficiently manufactured using more commonly using more commonly used reactors (Towler, 2012).
A fluidized bed reactor is used to produce a variety of products. In fuel industry, a fluidized bed reactor is used to produce gasolines, propane, butane, and propylene (Washington University, 2016). While these are some of the common uses of fluidized bed reactor, good mixing and energy efficient nature of the reactor allows a fluidized bed to be used in producing a less conventional fluidized bed reactor product such as photovoltaic cells. REC Silicon uses fluidized bed to produce purified silicon for photovaltaic cells as shown in the picture (Computational Particle Fluid Dynamics, 2016). Unlike the traditional method of covering seed rods with a superheated silicon gas, the method used by REC Silicon lets the seed granules to float inside a fluidized bed reactor. Then, silane gas enters from the bottom and when it comes in contact with the seed granule, the gas breaks down and covers it with silicon. Once enough silicon layer is sufficiently deposited, the larger and heavier granules exit the fluidized bed reactor. This process consumes 80-90% less energy than the traditional method (REC Silicon, 2016).
In order to manually design a fluidized bed reactor which would yield a useful information, myriads of parameters such as porosity at minimum fluidization, minimum fluidization velocity, bubble size, minimum fluidization velocity, velocity of bubble rise, fraction of the total bed occupied by bubbles, fraction of the bed consisting of wakes, volume of the catalyst in the bubbles, clouds and emulsion, mass transfer coefficient between bubble and cloud and additional information must be obtained experimentally (Brown,2008). For most purposes, such manual calculation is not only tedious but also has a great chance of yielding an incorrect result. Instead of carrying out a manual calculation, it is practical to use a simulation software such as Aspen HYSYS. Unfortunately however, Aspen HYSYS does not have a good way to handle solids in streams. Furthermore, it does not have advanced reactors such as the fluidized bed reactor. Aspen Plus allows the users to handle solids and model a fulidized bed reactor (AspenTech, 2014).
Limitation (Aspen Plus Fluidized Bed Reactor Simulation)
While Aspen Plus allows the simulation to yield as realistic result as possible, the general heuristic is that the catalyst particle sizes should be generally less than a 300 micro-meter (Towler, 2012). Also, the fluid of the reactants entering the reactor from the bottom should be above the minimum fluidization velocity of the particle, which is the minimum linear velocity of the reactant to keep the solid particles in the air (Brown, 2008). Furthermore, the simulation may not correctly reflect what really happens in the reactor. For example, Aspen Plus requires an entering and exiting streams of solid particles in the simulation (AspenTech, 2014). However, in a real fluidized bed reactor, a fixed amount of catalyst is put into the reactor and kept from leaving the reactor by controlling the fluidization velocity. The catalysts are switched when their life cycle is done and this switching of catalyst could be modeled as a continuous flow of solid particles. However, it is important to note that what is on the flow sheet of the simulation may not be a correct representation of the real system.
When dealing with chemical reactions, knowing details about the reaction is key. The products and reactants should be known and any identifying properties known. Examples of the properties being referred to are the phase of the reaction, the interactions between molecules, and the effects of the reaction occurring. In addition, any potential side reactions that can occur should be noted and the conditions under which they are more likely to occur should be identified.
HYSYS is able to simulate solids, liquids, and gases. When working exclusively with gases and liquids, there is little information required other than operating parameters. Using the fluid package specified and equilibrium data, HYSYS will determine the vapor and liquid fractions. When modelling solids, additional information is required. Because solids are more heterogeneous than liquids and gases, information such as the size of the particles used, chemical composition, and moisture content must be input into a simulation (AspenTech).
There are numerous fluid packages to choose from in HYSYS, however most simulations can be accomplished with one of five fluid packages. If the system is entirely gases or nonpolar liquids, then Peng-Robinson will work well. If it contains electrolytes in the reaction, NRTL electrolyte will be effective at simulating the reaction. If simulating high pressure gases where the boiling points of the components are known, UNIQUAC will accurately simulate the system; if the boiling points are unknown UNIFAC may work better. If the reaction contains polymers, the SAFT fluid package is able to account for the properties in the reaction (Washington State University).
Before entering the simulation environment, certain steps must be taken to ensure that HYSYS is able to create a model that will be useful. A component list must be created, the reactions occurring, including unwanted reactions, should be noted, and the fluid package must be specified, and the type reaction to be simulated must be selected.
The input components must be selected that will be reacting. To do so, go to the tab labeled as component list. There is the option to add a new component. The components can be searched for by either their scientific or common names. It is not necessary to select the products of the reaction at this step and HYSYS will be able to determine the products. HYSYS is also able to determine any intermediate components that must be created during a reaction.
A conversion reaction is the simplest type in HYSYS. A conversion reaction operates on a stoichiometric basis and will run until either the limiting reagent is exhausted or until the specified conversion has been achieved. These reactions do not function well with other reactions occurring simultaneously and should be used exclusively with other conversion reactions (Reactions in HYSYS). When specifying the conversion fraction it is important to use the percent form rather than the decimal form; meaning input 50 rather than .5 for half conversion.
Equilibrium reactions require more inputs than conversion reactions do. They rely upon the reactions equilibrium constant, Keq. There are many different ways to input Keq into HYSYS. The first method is to assume that the equilibrium constant has a set value and input the desired value. The next method is to use a relationship to determine the equilibrium constant as a function of temperature and tabulate a series of equilibrium constants over the applicable temperature range. HYSYS is able to generate equilibrium constants for systems that behave in an ideal manner using the Ideal Gas Gibbs Free Energy Coefficients. Equilibrium reactions should be performed in the Equilibrium Reactor, General Reactor, or Gibbs Reactor although the stoichiometry will be a factor when using the Gibbs Reactor. The simulation is not accurate or useful when performed in a CSTR or PFR (Reactions in HYSYS).
Heterogeneous Catalytic Reaction
As the name suggests, the Heterogeneous Catalytic Reaction pack is used to simulate systems with a catalyst. The catalyst used in these reactions is most frequently a solid and the porosity, void fraction, and the chemical makeup and moisture content should be specified. The simulation is most effective when used in a PFR reactor as it is the most likely scenario where a solid catalyst is used although it can also be simulated in a CSTR but this has the potential to damage the equipment when the impellers strike the catalysts (Reactions in HYSYS).
Kinetic reactions require an input of the reaction parameters. A kinetic reaction depends on the parameters unique to the system and the concentration of the reactants as well as the products. The parameters required are the reaction constants, k, activation energies, E, and the pre-exponential factors, A. The reaction order is input by the user so that HYSYS may know how to treat the reaction as a function of the concentrations. This reaction type also ahs the possibility for a backwards reaction, however, this will only occur if the activation energy and pre-exponential factors have been input for the reverse reaction. Kinetic reactions are best simulated using a CSTR or a PFR (Reactions in HYSYS).
When managing reactions, the reactions that will occur must be specified in stoichiometric balance. This step is key to the simulation being successful because if a reaction should occur and is not listed, HYSYS will not have that reaction occur. In addition, this step is how the product of a reaction are inserted into the simulation environment as they were not added in the component list. This is also the step where any reaction parameters are input into HYSYS. A shortcoming of early HYSYS versions is that only two significant figures will be displayed even when additional digits are included making it potentially confusing if sharing a simulation with others. The other convention of not for HYSYS reaction management page is that the Reaction Heat is defined such that exothermic reactions are positive, contrary to how heat of reaction is usually defined (Reactions in HYSYS).
In general, the user will attach a defined reaction set, generated as described above, to each reactor. This allows precise coordination of reactions that may be occurring in different units in the entire process.
Plug Flow Reactor (PFR)
Plug Flow Reactors are tubular reactors that assume perfect radial mixing and approximate zero axial dispersion (Towler, 2012). A PFR is used primarily for gas phase reactions. HYSYS PFRs can utilize kinetic, equilibrium, and heterogenous catalysis reaction types (Rice). The user must define an inlet streams and an outlet stream; like most HYSYS units, multiple streams can enter the same unit. An optional energy stream can be specified to either provide or remove heat; if no stream is specified, HYSYS assumes that the unit operates adiabatically. However, depending on user specifications, HYSYS can determine required energy for the specified operation.
The user can view parameters and variables resulting from the integration of physical specifications and the specified chemical reaction after the operation converges.
The user must define physical properties of the reactor such as volume, cross sectional area, and length. Based on geometry, only two of the three parameters must be specified. Additionally, the program provides the option to define a number of tubes included in the unit. The specified length will encompass all tubes.
Pressure drop through the PFR can be defined by the user, approximated as zero, or left for HYSYS to calculate. User-defined pressure drops can be useful in accordance with the process as a whole but a zero approximation can serve for initial simulations if a pressure drop is not know. HYSYS will calculate using the Ergun equation.
A void fraction must be specified with unity referring to zero reactor packing. If a value other than unity is specified, the user must input data for the packing. Note that this data has a purely physical relationship with the system such as mean particle size, solid density, solid heat capacity, etc. and does not relate the the chemical reaction occurring in the unit. If the PFR is using a reaction set with a Heterogeneous Catalytic Reaction, that information will be specified in the reaction itself.
The HYSYS PFR divides the unit into sub-volumes based on total length where calculations occur throughout the PFR. The default number of sub-volumes is 20, but this number can be specified by the user. Of course, a higher number of sub-volumes will generally lead to a more accurate simulation but may be unnecessary given the operation or limitations due to time and computation capacity. Properties of unresolved sub-volumes can be user-specified using the "Minimum Step Fraction" and "Minimum Step Length" inputs. The Performance tab can provide useful information about various variables and their values in each sub-volume. Additionally, after convergence, the user can view various graphs of process variable changes throughout each sub-volume.
Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR)
The Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor assumes perfect mixing throughout the volume of the reactor and the outlet conditions are approximated as equal to conditions inside the reactor. The "General Reactors" (Equilibrium Reactor, Conversion Reactor, Gibbs Reactor) each is a CSTR with a specialization in its corresponding HYSYS Reaction Type. The kinetics, equilibrium, and heterogeneous catalysis reaction types can be used with the generic CSTR.
The CSTR requires at least one input stream and can consider both vapor and liquid phases internally with corresponding liquid and vapor outlets. Primarily, CSTRs are used for liquid reactions, and thus the vapor outlet can be omitted, but the option exists nonetheless. The user can also omit the liquid outlet but this is not recommended and a PFR should be considered instead.
As with the PFR, an optional energy input can be specified or omitted to assume an adiabatic operation. Additionally, HYSYS can calculate the energy input given that the user specifies the appropriate variables.
A pressure drop is unlikely to be substantial with a CSTR but can be entered by the user; the default pressure drop is assumed to be zero, or HYSYS can calculate a pressure drop based on outlet stream information. The volume should be calculated or estimated and user-defined on the unit information page. Based on gemoetry, the user will need to enter two of the following: volume, diameter, or height. The default geometry is cylindrical, and the user can choose a verital or horizontal arrangement. An option exists to use a spherical CSTR as well.
Unique to the CSTR, an option exists to model as a flash drum separator if a solution cannot be found. This option may enhance or limit the desired outputs depending on the situation.
Like the PFR, after convergence, the CSTR unit page can show parameter and variable outputs based on integration of physical specifications and the chemical reaction.
The Conversion Reactor is a CSTR with a specialization in conversion reactions and thus can only function with reaction sets including that reaction type. Unique to this reactor, conversion X becomes a process variable defined as
where A is the base component of the reaction. Like other variables, this can be solved for by HYSYS or specified by the user depending on the degrees of freedom analysis.
Conversion is defined through the base component specified when defining the reaction. The HYSYS conversion equation provides the capability to define conversion based on temperature to the first and second powers, for the second and third terms, respectively, of the equation. If those terms are set to zero, conversion will proceed as a constant value defined in the first term of the equation. In the figure, conversion is not temperature dependent and will convert 50% of the base component to products.
Due to the simplicity of this reaction type, this reactor can integrate multiple different reactions in the same unit. The product of one reaction can serve as the reactant of another, and so on. This can be extremely useful for complex reactor designs.
The Gibbs Reactor is an extremely unique CSTR in that it does not require a reaction set to be attached in order to function. The Gibbs Reactor will simply produce an outlet in which the Gibbs free energy of the mixture is minimized (AspenTech, 2005). Of course, a reaction set can be attached to this reactor, but it is important to note that any parameters specified in the set will not be included in the simulation as the minimization of free energy will be the dominant simulation method. An exception to this rule is the stoichiometry of the reaction set. Without a set, stoichiometry will not be considered in the simulation; however, with an attached reaction set with stoichiometric parameters, the simulation will account for them and the outlet conditions can change. However, if a set is attached, only the components specified in the set will reach an equilibrium point; other components will be neglected.
The "Reactions" tab on the Gibbs Reactor is where the user makes the decision described above. "Gibbs Reactions Only" minimizes the free energy of the inlet stream to produce the outlet streams. "Specify Equilibrium Reactions" allows the user to attach a reaction set in which free energy is minimized according to the equilibrium kinetics and stoichiometry of the set. Lastly, the reactor can serve as a flash separator by selecting "NO Reactions".
The Gibbs Reactor can be very useful if the user does not possess any data pertinent to the reaction or desires only a simulation of the equilibrium state. At the very least, the Gibbs Reactor can provide simulation estimates as a starting point for a more rigorous simulation through another reactor type.
Aspen Plus Fluidized Bed Reactor Simulation
Overall Steps of Aspen Plus Simulation
In terms of its setup, the fluidized bed reactor siumulation in Aspen Plus is similar to those of the other types of reactors in Aspen HYSYS, but different in a sense that information about solid needs to be specified. As the initial step, the units and the components which exist in the system should be set and the property method which is similar to the fluid packages of Aspen HYSYS must be selected to closely model the solids in the actual system. Once all the specification is made, then the input and output streams of the reactants and products must be connected to the bottom and top of the reactor respectively. In addition, the inlet and outlet stream of solid particles must be connected to the left and right sides of the reactor respectively, even though the actual physical system may not have a solid particle stream entering or leaving the reactor. However, if a fluidized bed reactor requires a means of recovering the catalyst solid, a cyclone and a dryer may be used together to achieve to recover the solid particles. Generally, cyclone is a more effective way of separating gas from solid than gravity settling chamber (Peters, 2003). However, fabric filters, venturi scrubbers, and dry electrostatic precipitators are other options for separating solid from gas (Seider, 2004). Also, if there is a need to dry the solid particles, a dryer can be used. Specifically, if the solid particles are sensitive to thermal decomposition, spray drier may be used, as long as the catalyst can withstand the high pressure required for droplet formation (Ulrich 1984). Finally, after all the necessary equipment is set up in the simulator, the mesh and distribution function is checked to see if the reasonable output is obtained from the simulation. In wiki-page, the detailed steps and screenshots obtained from Aspen Tech manual is shown below and only cyclone is shown in the page for brevity.
Step 1: Solids Flow Sheet Templates
Step 2: Specify Global Units
Step 3: Find Compound
Desired compounds must be found and identified as in Aspen HYSYS.
Step 4: Specify Stream as Solid
Step 5: Set Property Method
Step 6:Specify Proerty Specification
Step 7: Specify Properties of Desired Compounds
Necessary parameters and components are selected at this step.
Step 8: Specify Stream Class
Step 9: Create PSD mesh
Step 10: Create Additional PSD Mesh
Additional PSD meshes can be created.
Step 11: Specify PSD Section for a CI Solid Form
If a stream only has a solid component, only fill out the CI Solid tab within this form and leave the Mixed tab blank. If a stream is partially solid, then it is necessary to fill out both streams. Both the Specifications and Particle Size Distribution sections must be filled out at least.
Step 12: Create a New PSD mesh in CI Solid Form
A previously specified mesh could be used but a new PSD mesh ID can be selected from the dropdown menu.
Step 13: Use a Distribution Function
This step is done to populate the PSD for a specific stream. After all the inputs are entered, calculate "Calculate" to obtain a plot of the defined PSD. This can be used to check if mesh and function match.
Step 14: Add Reactors and Other Components
A fluidized bed reactor is put on the flowsheet. The solid stream enters from the left and exits on the right side of the reactor. In the reaction effluent. The inlet stream of the reactants enters the reactor from the bottom and the reaction effluent exits to the top. stream, some of the solid particles will be included in it. Therefore, a cyclone is used to separate the solids and send it back to the solid stream.
Degrees of Freedom
A degree of freedom analysis will assist in reaching a state of convergence for the reactor and downstream units (Felder, 2005). For a reactor,
in which the number of degrees of freedom is expressed as the number of unknown variables plus the number of reactions occurring minus the number of material balances able to be performed on the system (Wikibooks, 2014). In order for the simulation to converge, the user must specify as many variables as existing degrees of freedom. The simulation will then calculate unspecified variables.
As far as fluidized bed reactor simulation is concerned, Aspen Plus is a highly capable tool that allows the user to investigate how different factors affect the design of the actual fluidized bed reactor. Especially after the fluidized bed reactor is simulated, the user can obtain numerous relevant information regarding the reactor such as the dimensions of the reactor and heat removal requirements. However, it is important to note the fact that the output from the simulation needs to be checked constantly to make sure that all of the values fall in a reasonable range. Due to the fact that manual calculation for the fluidized bed reactor is burdensome and requires so many parameters, it is sometimes difficult to check for the reliability of the values given by the simulation. Still, as long as the users are aware of the fact that the simulation may not be perfect, Aspen Plus provides a convenient way to model and handle a process that involves solid and more complex reactors such as fluidized bed reactor.
In general, the AspenPlus simulation program can handle more rigorous process simulation. Several other types of simulation programs are available as well.
AspenTech, "FAQ: Solids Modeling in AspenPlus", 2014
"Reactions in HYSYS" Rice University Chemical Engineering Department, [http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~ceng403/hysys/reactions.html "Reactions in HYSYS"
Washington State University's Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering, "Basics of HYSYS"
G.P. Towler, R. Sinnott, Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. p.186-194, Elsevier (2012).
AspenTech. HYSYS 2005.2 Simulation Basis. Chapter 9 (2005).
AspenTech. Jump Start: Solids Process Modeling in Aspen Plus. (2014)
Washington University. Current Applications for Fluidized Bed Reactors. (2016)
REC Silicon. REC Silicon's Fluidized Bed Reactor (FBR) Process. (2016)
R.M. Felder, R.W. Rousseau, Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes. 3rd edition, Wiley (2005).
Wikibooks, Introduction to Chemical Engineering Processes, 2014. <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Introduction_to_Chemical_Engineering_Processes/Problem_considerations_with_molecular_balances>
AspenTech. Jump Start: Solids Process Modeling in Aspen Plus. (2014)
L.F. Brown, H.S. Fogler, Diffusion and Reaction in Porous Catalysts. Chapter 12 (2008)
W.D. Seider, J.D. Seader, D.R. Lewin, Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis, and Evaluation, Wiley: New York, 2004.
M.S. Peters, K.D. Timmerhaus, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Ed., McGraw-Hill: New York, 2003.
G.D. Ulrich, A Guide to Chemical Engineering Process Design and Economics, Wiley: New York, 1984