Author: John Marsiglio 
Stewards: Daniel Garcia and Fengqi You
Introduction and Overview
Solids-involved equipment is an important aspect of many processes. Solids are often more difficult to handle than liquids because the process equipment consumes more energy to operate, are more prone to mechanical failure, and can create dust. Dusts can be very dangerous. They can cause respiratory illnesses and in cases of combustible dust such as the Domino sugar plant, cause explosions in confined spaces. Flow of solids is also difficult to predict. While rheology is a well studied field for fluids, powder rheology is not a well characterized field. There are many pieces of process equipment aimed at handling solids. A bin is a vertical vessel used for storing solids. Large bins with with roughly a height to diameter ratio of 1.5 are called silos. Bins with height to diameter ratio less than this are called bunkers. From a silo or bunker solids will move out of an orifice, or hopper, to a feeder. Solids may be conveyed in a number of ways. The most familiar of these ways is a belt conveyer, like the ones used at the Domino sugar plant. There are also screw conveyors, which are used to convey free-flowing solids over short distances. Screw conveyors have been used since the time of Archimedes who made them famous with his Archimedes screw. Other types include hydraulic and pneumatic conveyors.
Industrial Separation of Solids
Currently there are many different ways to separate solids from liquids or gases. The most industrially important pieces of equipment are used to separate solid particles from gasses. A sector of this field, known as air pollution control is often glossed over in most chemical engineering undergraduate courses. However, it is an extremely important topic in industrial chemical plant design for reasons of employee health and EPA guidelines. However, there are other reasons to separate solids from gases, such as to prevent buildup of combustible dusts, as in the instance of the Domino sugar factory explosion.
As the name implies, gravity settlers are simply a long chamber through which gas-solid systems are sent. Over the length of the chamber larger particle settle out of the gas stream. Large particle sizes (>50um) can be removed from the system this way. The effectiveness of the settling chambers can be increased by disrupting gas flow with such features as baffles. Impingement separators use many baffles in this way to collect solid particles. THe addition of baffles causes higher pressure drops than in simple settling chambers, but also allow for particle sizes >10um to be collected. The advantages of using gravity settlers for particle separations would be the low cost and their applications in high temperature, high pressure, or corrosive environments.
When a gravity settler is insufficient, centrifugal separation can be employed. This piece of process equipment is known as a cyclone. Like gravity settlers, cyclones can be used in high temperature, high pressure applications. A cyclone resembles an inverted cone, in which solid-gas systems enter along the side. As the gas stream swirls down towards the apex of the cyclone, particles contact the walls causing them to fall to the bottom. The cleaned gas stream will then exit at the top by moving upwards in a tighter spiral. Solids then fall out the bottom. See figure 1 for more details. Cyclones are particularly effective, able to handle particle sizes down to 5um, and with no moving parts they are an industry favorite.
When designing a cyclone there are two main designs: high efficiency and high throughput. Cyclone choice should be based on the industrial application, and its requirements of gas cleaning. Figure 2 below compares the dimensional differences between (a) high efficiency cyclones and (b) high throughput cyclones.
The particle control measure that the average consumer would be most familiar with would be the baghouse. A baghouse is a simple concept of many filters, and dust collection in bags, much like the home vacuum cleaner. This system diverges from the home vacuum cleaner bag in that these filters must be periodically cleaned, and some are coated in a viscous mineral oil to help trap dust. The can handle particulates down to 10um.
Wet scrubbing is a very effective method for reducing dust in gas streams. A typical wet scrubbing system features a solid-gas stream flowing concurrently to a liquid, generally water, stream. When particles impact the water stream they become trapped. Wet scrubbers can remove particle sizes down to 0.5um. While effective scrubbers are also expensive, which is why other less expensive means of air pollution control are often employed.
Electrostatic Precipitators, or ESPs, are some of the most effective air pollution control equipment. They can remove very fine particles. To do so gas-solid streams in an ESP pass between two plates of negative and positive charge. These plates are able to collect particles based on their charges. While incredibly effective, constructing and operating an ESP is very expensive, which is why they are only used when necessary in industry.
AspenTech HYSYS can be a powerful tool to simulate the use of solids involved equipment in handling solids. One widely used piece of solids involved equipment is the cyclone which, in its many forms, can be used to remove solids from a gas stream. To begin the appropriate gases (in this case nitrogen and oxygen,) must be added to the simulation along with the solid. HYSYS does not have many solids to choose from in the simulation. This simulation will remove calcium particles mixed in an air stream.
The choice of fluid package depends greatly on the fluids and the operating conditions. In this case the general NRTL is sufficient.
From here the simulation environment is ready. Start by specifying a feed stream. In this case a feed of air with a small amount of calcium is specified.
Next the cyclone can be placed in the environment, and the appropriate streams may be attached to the appropriate positions. The simulation should look something like below.
The cyclone needs a few specifications before the simulation will converge. Under parameters the efficiency method and particle efficiency must be specified. The Lapple method is the simpler of the two and generally good, although in some cases the Leith-Licht theory is a better approximation. Either is fine for this simulation. Particle efficiencies for cyclones generally run on the order of 50-80%.
Right now only the solid component is specified. For the cyclone to converge the particle size must be specified. This may either be in the form of a single particle size, or a particle size distribution centered around a value. In this case a single particle size is selected, but in the case of selecting a particle size distribution the largest particle size must also be specified.
At this point the cyclone should be converged. Cyclone sizing can also be specified. In this area HYSYS has default specifications. They can however be changed for a specific value depending on the cyclone size. For a detailed description of cyclone sizing please see Sinnott and Towler
Finally if the system is not converging after specifying the particle size, the constraints on the cyclone will have to be modified under the constraints tab. Either the maximum number of cyclones or the maximum pressure drop needs to be increased to get a cyclone that is not converging to converge.
Solids involved process equipment are an essential piece of the chemicals industry. Unfortunately most undergraduate process design courses spend little time covering their applications. However, the design of solids involved process equipment is straightforward, and with the appropriate references, and powerful simulation tools such as HYSYS, the design of solids involved process equipment should not be a daunting task for the entry level process engineer.
- G.P. Towler, R. Sinnott, Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design, Elsevier, 2013.
- R.H. Perry, D. W. Green, Eds., Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, 6th Ed., McGrawHill: New York, 1984.
- L.T. Biegler, I.E. Grossmann, A.W. Westerberg, Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design, Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, 1997.
- W.D. Seider, J.D. Seader, D.R. Lewin, Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis, and Evaluation, Wiley: New York, 2004.
- R.T. Turton, R.C. Bailie, W.B. Whiting, J.A. Shaeiwitz, Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes, Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, 2003.